• Accessibility Tools
    Color Contrast
    Text Size
    Others
Menu Toggle
More
    Close

    September 2026 Orders in Admission Matters

    S. No. Case No. Case Topic Order Date Coram Attachment File
    1. CCPD-AD-0051/2026 Mr. Shaik Zaheer Vs. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO), National Trust, New Delhi alleging that the renewal of his daughter’s Niramaya Health Insurance Card remained pending despite payment of the requisite renewal fee. 01-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 293 KB)
    2. CCPD/16264/1012/2025(DNO/25/CCPD/4757) Shri Pushkarraj Bahety Vs. The Executive Officer, Reserve Bank of India stating that the online application form for the RBI Grade B Officer Examination 2025 does not provide an option for candidates with low vision to avail compensatory (extra) time. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    3. DNO/25/CCPD/5251 Shri Rohit Kumar Mishra Vs. The Principal Chief Material Manager, West Central Railway AND The Senior Material Manager, Katni Loco Shed, West Central Railway alleged that, despite being eligible for promotion to the post of Junior Clerk, his representation dated 14.10.2024 was rejected vide letter dated 06.10.2025, citing Railway Board’s letter dated 31.12.2024, which he contends is inconsistent with the spirit and intent of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgment and DoPT instructions. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    4. DNO/26/CCPD/6062 Akhilraj Raj Thakur Vs. CBA Services Private Limited, Karnataka stated that despite suffering from severe depression, subsequently supported by medical evidence indicating a high severity score, his employment was terminated in December 2025 on the ground of unsatisfactory performance, without due consideration of his medical condition. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 120 KB)
    5. DNO/26/CCPD/6137 Ms. KUNALI Vs. SECRETARY, Dak Bhawan, Department of Posts AND The Assistant Director General (Admin), Department of Posts, stated that her candidature was rejected on account of an inadvertent clerical error in the online application, wherein she mentioned “CBSE” instead of the Haryana Board of School Education. She submitted that the error was unintentional and that all her supporting documents reflected the correct educational qualification and details. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 123 KB)
    6. DNO/26/CCPD/6142 Shubham Rajvanshi Vs. The Chief General Manager, Central Bank of India stated that his father-in-law is with benchmark visual impairment and his mother-in-law has benchmark locomotor disability, and that their disability details have been duly updated in his HRMS records. He further submitted that his father is suffering from kidney failure and is undergoing regular dialysis. In view of these circumstances, he has been seeking transfer to Udaipur or Jaipur on compassionate grounds since December 2024 through multiple HRMS applications and representations. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    7. DNO/26/CCPD/6209 Shri Mayank Arora Vs. The Chairman and Managing Director, Bharat Electronics Ltd. submitted that the Respondent, Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), has repeatedly failed to comply with the statutory reservation policy for persons with benchmark disabilities in its recruitment processes. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 133 KB)
    8. DNO/26/CCPD/6211 Smt. Kanchan Sadabhai Parmar Vs. The Director General, Postal Services AND The Chief Post Master General (Gujarat Circle) AND The Department of Personnel and Training, submitted that the Respondent, Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), has repeatedly failed to comply with the statutory reservation policy for persons with benchmark disabilities in its recruitment processes. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 155 KB)
    9. DNO/26/CCPD/6216 Shri Aditya Prakash Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, EPFO AND The Chairman, Bihar Gramin Bank alleging wrongful denial of family pension following the demise of their father, who was an EPS-1995 pensioner and an employee of Bihar Gramin Bank. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 127 KB)
    10. DNO/26/CCPD/6228 Shri Kartikey Singh Vs. The Director, AIIMS, New Delhi contesting that he had qualified the AIIMS Common Recruitment Examination (CRE) under Group Code 02, securing All India Rank 165 and OBC-PwBD Category Rank 2. It was
    submitted that despite his merit, his candidature had been cancelled, and he had been denied participation in the choice filling process for seat allocation.    		 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    11. DNO/26/CCPD/6253 Mr. Sitender Vs. The Director General, Employees State Insurance Corporation submitted that he was transferred from the ESIC Branch Office, Rohtak to the Regional Office, Faridabad. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 122 KB)
    12. DNO/26/CCPD/6254 Shri Vivek Yadav Vs. The Chairman, National Highways Authority of India stating that he purchased an adapted car for his personal use, bearing registration number UP 72 CF 9025, and applied several months ago for a FASTag with toll tax exemption available to persons with disabilities. However, the FASTag has not been issued till date. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 120 KB)
    13. DNO/26/CCPD/6255 Mr. Said Ahmad Vs. The Joint Secretary & Chief Administrative Officer, Ministry of Defense stating that he was selected for the post of Assistant Registrar in the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on deputation basis. However, despite his selection and willingness to join, his parent department did not relieve him, stating that the Cadre Controlling Authority had not granted approval. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 128 KB)
    14. DNO/26/CCPD/6260 Shri Aashish Kumar Jha Vs. The Director General, Postal Services AND The Chief Postmaster General (Bihar Circle) AND The Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training alleged that appointment-related memoranda had been issued by the postal authorities and that he was repeatedly assured that his services would be regularized. However, despite rendering service for nearly ten years, his services were never regularized and, upon raising the issue, he was allegedly terminated from service. Aggrieved by the alleged illegal termination and non-regularization, the Complainant approached this Court seeking appropriate relief. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 128 KB)
    15. DNO/26/CCPD/6283 Shri Banti Kumar Vs. The Director, IIT Roorkee alleged that IIT Roorkee is stating that it cannot modify the data received from NTA, which has prevented him from availing compensatory time and uploading Form-I before the registration deadline. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    16. DNO/26/CCPD/6349 Shri Bavyesh Badhwar (represented by his mother Ms. Vinkle Badhwar) Vs. The Chairman, CBSE AND The Principal, Seth Hukam Chand SD Public School, Kapurthala AND The Chairman, ICSE (impleaded) despite accepting the admission fee for Class I for the academic session 2026–27, the school allegedly refused to permit the child to continue from the second day of the academic session. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 130 KB)
    17. DNO/26/CCPD/6059 HARISH CHANDRA Vs. The Chairman, State Bank of India alleged that the delay in joining was attributable to the medical condition detected during the Bank’s own medical examination and that, despite belonging to the PwD category, his request was not reconsidered. He also submitted that he did not receive any formal physical communication regarding withdrawal of his candidature and became aware of the same through email communication. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    18. DNO/26/CCPD/6090 SYED SHAKEEB AHMAD Vs. The Chairman, State Bank of Inida submitted that on 12.03.2026, he visited the Specialized NRI Branch of State Bank of India, Varanasi, for updating the address in his passbook and for photo attestation required in connection with his Aadhaar address update. He alleged that, during the process, he was issued a passbook containing pages carrying sensitive financial particulars of another customer, which had allegedly been manually removed and his own account particulars were thereafter printed on the remaining pages. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 131 KB)
    19. DNO/26/CCPD/6385 Shri Manoj Kumar Tyagi Vs. The Vice Chairman, Delhi Development Authority stating that he was allotted an LIG flat under the DDA Housing Scheme 2017 in the Persons with Disabilities (PwD) category. He stated that he has paid the entire demanded amount and completed all the required formalities and documentation. However, despite fulfilling all the requirements, the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has not issued the possession letter. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 123 KB)
    20. DNO/26/CCPD/6555 Shri Nitesh Kumar Vs. The Director, NIEPVD/NIVH, Dehradun submitted a grievance dated 24.07.2026 contesting that eligible students of the 2023–2025 batch have not been provided laptops under the scheme of the National Institute for the Empowerment of Persons with Visual Disabilities (NIEPVD/NIVH), despite being entitled to receive them. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    21. DNO/26/CCPD/6036 Shri Himanshu Kabra Vs. The Chairman, Coal India Limited (CIL) regarding non-compliance with statutory PwD reservation during the departmental promotion/recruitment exercise from non-executive to executive category (HR discipline) under Notification No. 02/2025 issued by Coal India Limited (CIL). 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 129 KB)
    22. DNO/26/CCPD/6086 Dilip Pashi Vs. General Manager, South Eastern Railway AND Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway Workshop, Kharagpur submitted that he is a person with benchmark locomotor disability and the son of Late Shri Ram Piare Pashi, a former Railway employee, and Smt. Lakshmi Pashi, the present family pensioner. He stated that his disability status had been verified in the Railway records. He submitted that he had sought endorsement of his name as a disabled dependent in his mother’s PPO. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 121 KB)
    23. DNO/26/CCPD/6070 Shri Nilendra Moni Dutta Vs. The Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur alleging procedural irregularities and discrimination during the recruitment process for the post of Deputy Registrar (Advt. No. 1/2023) at Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 128 KB)
    24. DNO/26/CCPD/6363 Shri Swaviman Sahoo Vs. The Registrar, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela stated that while he was near the Jagda Gate of the National Institute of Technology (NIT), Rourkela, he was allegedly abused and physically assaulted by one of the two security guards posted at the gate. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 128 KB)
    25. DNO/26/CCPD/6398 Ms. Jancy D. (represented by Shri D. Sam Thomas) Vs. The Director General, Employees State Insurance Corporation stating that he is working as a Nursing Officer at ESIC Hospital, Tirunelveli, and is the only son and primary caregiver of his mother, who is a person with benchmark permanent locomotor disability and holds a valid UDID certificate. He stated that he was initially appointed at ESIC Hospital, Delhi in 2009 but was transferred to Tamil Nadu in 2013 on compassionate grounds to take care of his disabled mother, after giving up his seniority and promotional opportunities. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    26. DNO/26/CCPD/6358 Shri Jhatothu Rahul Vs. The General Manager, South Western Railway stating that on 29.04.2026 at around 7:30 PM, the Reservation Clerk refused to issue a railway ticket under the concessional reservation facility for persons with
    Thalassemia, stating that his railway concession form was not valid.    		 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    27. DNO/26/CCPD/6141 Ujala Safreen Vs. Director, National Insitute of Technology, Srinagar alleged discrimination, harassment and denial of academic rights on account of her disability and medical condition. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    28. DNO/26/CCPD/6143 KARAN PRATAP SINGH Vs. Chairman, State Bank of India alleged that, despite submitting the requisite documents, including the death certificate and nominee details, the SBI Branch at Nawabganj, Bareilly, did not permit him to access the locker, process its closure or settle the claim amount. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    29. DNO/26/CCPD/6152 HARISH CHANDRA Vs. Central Provident Fund Commissioner, (CPFC), EPFO alleging non-updation of his disability status in his Universal Account Number (UAN) profile maintained by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO). 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    30. DNO/26/CCPD/6499 Shri Rakesh Kumar Vs. The CEO and Managing Director, Canara Bank stating that he had requested a transfer from Ranchi to his hometown, Gaya, during the Annual General Transfer 2025 in accordance with the Bank’s transfer guidelines for persons with disabilities. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    31. DNO/26/CCPD/6361 Shri Rahul Kumar Singh Vs. The Secretary, Department of Posts AND The Senior Manager, Indian Post Payments Bank (Deoghar) alleged that despite repeated requests for more than one year, the IPPB Deoghar Branch Manager has failed to issue the required indemnity letter, has not responded properly to his requests, and has delayed the matter unnecessarily. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 122 KB)
    32. DNO/26/CCPD/6372 Shri Prahalad Gurjar Vs. The Chairman, Staff Selection Commission AND The Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension his candidature was rejected on the ground that his scribe possessed a higher educational qualification. The complainant alleged that there is no rule prohibiting a scribe from having a higher qualification and that the rejection is contrary to the DoPT Office Memorandum dated 29.08.2018, the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Vikash Kumar v. UPSC (2021). 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 146 KB)
    33. DNO/26/CCPD/6210 Ms. Kumari Rituvarna Banerjee (Represented by Shri Saikat Banerjee) Vs. The Deputy Director General, UIDAI Regional Office, Mumbai submitted that the Respondent authorities failed to facilitate the mandatory biometric update of the child’s Aadhaar despite repeated attempts. It was submitted that during visits to the Aadhaar Seva Kendra, the officials insisted upon capturing fingerprints despite the child’s disability, instead of invoking the Biometric Exception mechanism available under the UIDAI framework, resulting in repeated failure of enrolment and considerable hardship. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 134 KB)
    34. DNO/26/CCPD/6373 Shri Vishal Choudhary Vs. The Courter, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan Submitted a grievance dated 13.07.2026 and stated that he was working as a TGT (Sanskrit) at PM Shri Kendriya Vidyalaya, Mathana, Kurukshetra. He alleged that after being selected for another government post through the Haryana Staff Selection Court (HSSC), he submitted a technical resignation, but the school authorities wrongly treated it as a simple resignation, resulting in the loss of his past service benefits, including earned leave, pay protection, and gratuity. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 131 KB)
    35. CCPD-AD-0165/2026 Dr. A. Chidambaram Vs. The Director, National Institute of Speech and Hearing (NISH)Thiruvananthapuram AND The Member Secretary, Rehabilitation Council of India Submitted despite securing 6th rank, his daughter has not received an admission call letter. On enquiry, they came to know that non-Keralite candidates under the Management Quota are not being considered for admission this year, although this restriction was not mentioned in the prospectus. 08-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 241 KB)
    36. DNO/26/CCPD/6775 Shri Aashish Kohli Vs. The Assistant Director General of Medical Education (ADGME), Medical Counselling Committee AND The Chairman, National Medical Commission AND The Director, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital stated that he holds a valid permanent UDID card showing 45% disability. He submitted that the Designated Disability Board at VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital found him medically fit to pursue the MBBS course but reduced his disability percentage from 45% to 30%. He alleged that the reduction has prevented him from availing PwBD reservation in the ongoing NEET-UG counselling. He stated that he has already submitted a representation to DGHS/Nirman Bhawan regarding the matter. 11-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 247 KB)
    37. CCPD/16510/1022/2026(DNO/25/CCPD/4780) Shri Manoj Jain (father of Master Abhinav Jain) Vs. The Secretary, Department of Revenue AND The Chairman, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) AND The Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai AND The Commissioner of Customs (General), Jawahar Custom House, Nhava Sheva submitted a grievance dated 23.09.2025 against Preventive Service Order No. 06/2025-26 dated 15.09.2025, whereby he was transferred from Zone-II (Nhava Sheva) to Zone-I (Mumbai). 14-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 278 KB)
    38. DNO/26/CCPD/6258 Shri Biswajit Kumar Singh Vs. The Chairman, State Bank of India submitted that he had been directed to report to a branch located approximately one kilometre away from his registered place of residence without being granted joining time. He further submitted that he was neither permitted to continue at his existing place of posting nor formally relieved to join the new branch, resulting in the stoppage of his salary since September 2025. 16-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    39. CCPD-AD-0047/2026 Ms. Ishika Ojha Vs. The General Manager, Northern Railway, regarding theft of her luggage while travelling by train. 01-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 279 KB)
    40. DNO/25/CCPD/3992 Aakash Shah Vs. The Team leader, Maxicus Kochartech Kirti Plaza, Vadodara, Gujarat he is currently working as a KYC Representative in the document verification process at KocharTech (Maxicus, Vadodara) on a contractual basis, with his contract ending on 04 June 2025. He wishes to continue working in the same KYC process; however, the company is not allowing him to continue because he is working only the morning shift, while they require him to work night shifts. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 97 KB)
    41. DNO/26/CCPD/6430 Shri Jaswinder Singh Vs. The Chief General Manager, Bank of India, Mumbai Stated has been transferred from Punjab to Mumbai vide transfer order dated 13.05.2026. It was contended that he is the primary caregiver of his brother, a person with benchmark Intellectual Disability, whose disability is supported by the Disability Certificate/UDID Card placed on record. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 131 KB)
    42. DNO/26/CCPD/5449 Shri Shrivappa N Vs. The Director General, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation submitted a grievance dated 13.01.2026 that after joining the hospital on 19.09.2025 on transfer, his salary for October to December 2025 has not been released. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    43. DNO/26/CCPD/2324 Shri Vasantha Raman V Vs. The MD and CEO, Indian Bank submitted a grievance dated 04.08.2026 stating that he had requested a transfer to Salem on compassionate grounds due to fertility treatment and the need for family support. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    44. DNO/26/CCPD/6290 Ms. Arpita Sahoo Vs. The Nodal Officer, Air India Ltd. alleged that her power wheelchair, which is essential for her mobility, was not delivered upon her arrival at Bhubaneswar. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 122 KB)
    45. DNO/26/CCPD/6122 Shri Mohan Singh Vs. The General Manager, North Central Railway contesting that despite being eligible for notional promotion from Group ‘C’ to Group ‘B’ with effect from 30.06.2016 under the DoPT Office Memorandum dated 28.12.2023 and the corresponding Railway Board instructions, the Respondent had failed to extend the benefit. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 146 KB)
    46. DNO/26/CCPD/5455 Shri Jayesh Vankar Vs. The Chief General Manager, Bank of Baroda stated that he is the caregiver of his 9-year-old daughter, who has 50% intellectual disability and Type 1 diabetes and requires specialized medical treatment and therapy. he alleged that his requests for inter-regional transfer on medical and compassionate grounds have been repeatedly rejected, and his latest request has remained
    pending for several months despite the Bank’s transfer policy requiring timely disposal.    		 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 123 KB)
    47. DNO/26/CCPD/5455 Shri Jayesh Vankar Vs. The Chief General Manager, Bank of Baroda stated that he is the caregiver of his 9-year-old daughter, who has 50% intellectual disability and Type 1 diabetes and requires specialized medical treatment and therapy. he alleged that his requests for inter-regional transfer on medical and compassionate grounds have been repeatedly rejected, and his latest request has remained
    pending for several months despite the Bank’s transfer policy requiring timely disposal.    		 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 123 KB)
    48. DNO/26/CCPD/6212 Shri Ashutosh Kumar Karsh Vs. The Managing Director, National Divyangjan Finance and Development Corporation Regarding Denial of Loan 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 126 KB)
    49. DNO/26/CCPD/6202 Smt. Deepali Rai (on behalf of Arpita) Vs. The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan submitted that despite repeated requests, she was denied the facility of a scribe during Periodic Test-II and Periodic Test-III and was subsequently compelled to arrange a scribe independently for the final examination. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 129 KB)
    50. DNO/26/CCPD/6113 PRAKASH KATARIYA Vs. The CEO & MD, SBI General Insurance Company Limited contended that the rejection of his claim was contrary to the terms and spirit of the policy, particularly the provision relating to “entire and irrecoverable loss of sight”. He alleged that the Respondent had adopted an unduly restrictive interpretation of Permanent Total Disability by treating only complete loss of vision as qualifying for the benefit, while disregarding the permanent nature and functional impact of his visual impairment. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 127 KB)
    51. DNO/26/CCPD/6575 Shri Tarun Gupta Vs. The Managing Director and CEO, Punjab & Sind Bank Regarding Denial of Promotion 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 127 KB)
    52. DNO/26/CCPD/6467 Shri M. Vikram Aditya Reddy Vs. The Registrar, University of Hyderabad alleged that, against the total Ph.D. intake, the University had earmarked seats for PwBD candidates but no PwBD seat had been earmarked for the Department of Communication. The Complainant further raised concerns regarding implementation of reservation, accessibility, reasonable accommodation and the functioning of the relevant disability-related institutional mechanisms during the admission process. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 139 KB)
    53. DNO/26/CCPD/6558 Shri Chandan Kumar Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs submitted that upon his transfer to Lucknow, he applied for General Pool Residential Accommodation (GPRA) under the Persons with Disabilities (PwD) category through the e-Sampada portal. He contended that despite being placed first on the waiting list under the PwD category for a Type-IV accommodation, no quarter was allotted to him under the reserved quota, whereas applicants lower in priority under the general category were allotted accommodation. He further alleged that the Respondent had failed to implement the 4% reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities in allotment of government residential accommodation, as envisaged under the applicable policy. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 127 KB)
    54. DNO/26/CCPD/6261 Shri Umesh Kumar Jain Vs. The Chairman, National Highways Authority of India submitted a grievance dated 23.04.2026 that he applied for an exempt FASTag on 04.04.2026 vide Application No. RO-JAI-1793356088-04042026. However, the application status is still showing “Pending for Verification and Approval at RO-NHAI.” He stated that despite sending an email to the concerned Regional Office, he has not received any response. He requested intervention for early verification and approval of his application so that the exempt FASTag may be issued to him. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 122 KB)
    55. DNO/25/CCPD/4124 Mr. D. Gnana Bharati Vs. The President, National Sports Federation of lndia submitted that the sporting event suffered from significant accessibility and infrastructure deficiencies, including improper lane dimensions, poorly installed lane separators causing water disturbance, inadequate shaded areas, absence of lodging facilities, provision of food only through paid coupons, and lack of arrangements for caregivers accompanying persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. 16-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 118 KB)
    56. DNO/26/CCPD/5951 Ms. Nupur (Represented by her father, Dr. Sushil Kumar) Vs. The District Magistrate / Collector, District Southeast, Delhi AND The Joint Secretary & CEO, The National Trust regarding the delay of more than nine months in issuance of the Legal Guardianship Certificate under Section 14 of the National Trust Act. It was submitted that the Complainant’s parents, aged 82 and 83 years, are super senior citizens and are suffering from serious health complications, due to which they are finding it increasingly difficult to manage her day-to-day affairs. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 104 KB)
    57. CCPD-AD-0166/2026 Ms. Bhavani Kedia Vs. The General Secretary, All India Sports Council of the Deaf AND The Secretary, Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports AND The Director General, Sports Authority of India alleged that despite selection trials being conducted, the players were not informed in a timely manner regarding participation, training, visa and travel arrangements, and were informed only about one month prior to the Championship that the women’s team would not participate. She alleged lack of transparency and equal opportunity and sought an inquiry and appropriate corrective measures. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 209 KB)
    58. CCPD-AD-0064/2026 Shri Lakshmi Kant Ramesh Chandra Patel Vs. The State Bank of India (SBI) alleging that despite joining the bank in 2009 under the visually impaired category and being eligible for promotion from MMGS-III to SMGS-IV, his promotion has been withheld. 16-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 217 KB)
    59. CCPD-OF-0021/1022/2026 Shri Krishna Chandra Sethy Vs. The Director General Ordnance Factories, Kolkata AND The Chairman and Managing Director, Munitions India Limited regarding transfer to a MIL unit at Pune on grounds of caregiving for his child with benchmark disability 17-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 227 KB)
    60. CCPD-OF-0023/1041/2026(CCPD-AD-0015/2026) Mr. Shiva Royal Vs. The Chairman, National Testing Agency (NTA), ND AND Head iON Digital Zone, Lucknow regarding the non-provision of appropriate reasonable accommodation, specifically the failure to provide a competent and timely scribe by the National Testing Agency (NTA) for the CUET (UG) 2026 examination in the subjects of English, Accountancy, and Business Studies, resulting in an inability to effectively attempt the examination. 17-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 226 KB)
    61. CCPD-OF-0034/1041/2026(CCPD-AD-0061/2026) Ms. Swati Sharma Vs. The Chairman, SSC, New Delhi regarding provision of an incompetent scribe in the SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) Examination, 2025, denial of permission to use her own qualified scribe, and consequential loss of opportunity in post allocation. 16-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 240 KB)
    62. DNO/26/CCPD/6439 Ms. Shrutha Pandit (represented by Shri Arun Pandit) Vs. The Director, Indian Institute of Science (Bangalore) AND The Director, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore submitted that the recruitment notification required candidates to submit a disability certificate in the prescribed format. However, the All India Institute of Speech and Hearing (AIISH), Mysuru, refused to issue the certificate in that format, stating that only the UDID card and the disability certificate issued along with it were valid. 26-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 129 KB)
    63. DNO/26/CCPD/6096 Mr. ISAHAN ALI Vs. The Chairman, Railway Recruitment Board alleged that despite directions from the Railway Board to issue joining letters to selected candidates, he had not been permitted to join for a period of approximately seven months. He contended that the Respondent has discriminated against Persons with Disabilities (PwD) candidates by withholding their joining while non- PwD candidates were being joined, in violation of his rights under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. 26-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 119 KB)
    64. DNO/26/CCPD/6549 Shri Sandeep Paridala Vs. The Chairman, State Bank of India stating that the Bank displays a wheelchair symbol against his name in the internal HRMS/Staff Directory, which is visible to all employees. He stated that while the Bank may maintain disability records for official purposes, there is no requirement to disclose his disability status to all staff. TheComplainant alleged that such disclosure violates his privacy and dignity, may lead to incorrect assumptions about his disability, and adversely affects his professional interactions. 26-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    65. DNO/26/CCPD/6404 & DNO/26/CCPD/6405 Ms. Praavya Shreyaskumar Joshi Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Education alleged that the Department of School Education & Literacy, Ministry of Education, has failed to effectively implement the right to free education for children with benchmark disabilities up to the age of 18 years under Section 31 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act, 2016). 26-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 128 KB)
    66. DNO/26/CCPD/6410 Shri Devesh Kumar Singh Vs. The MD & CEO Bank of Baroda alleged that, on account of pressure from the clerical union, the management thereafter transferred him, i.e., the Complainant, from Paharpur Branch to Mushahari Branch as a retaliatory action for having raised the whistleblower complaint. He submitted that instead of being appreciated for his action, he was punished through the said transfer. 26-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    67. DNO/26/CCPD/6436 Shri Pankaj Kumar Vs. The Director General, Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Ministry of Health & Family Welfare submitted that his Government accommodation has been allotted to him on medical grounds, in view of his disability, at Pandara Road, New Delhi, whereas his official sitting arrangement has been fixed at the NCDC Complex, Civil Lines, New Delhi, which is over 20 km away from his residence. 26-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 130 KB)
    68. DNO/26/CCPD/7135 Shri Kovid Jagdeo Manohar Vs. The Chairman, Staff Selection Commission AND The Joint Secretary, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities stated that he is scheduled to appear in the SSC CGL examination on 01.10.2026. He stated that the SSC notice allows scribes up to 22 years of age. when he tried to register his chosen scribe, who is 20 years and 3 months old, the portal rejected the scribe, apparently allowing only scribes below 20 years of age. 29-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 134 KB)
    69. CCPD-OF-0055/1015/2026(CCPD-AD-0170/2026) Ms. Neelam Sahni Vs. The Secretary Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) AND The Joint Secretary, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities regarding unlawfully declared medically unfit and identification of posts. 23-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 223 KB)
    70. CCPD-OF-0058/1022/2026(CCPD-AD-0172/2026) Shri Suman Kumar Jha Vs. The Chairman, Coal India Limited, regarding nonconsideration of transfer request to CIL Headquarters, Kolkata 23-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 227 KB)
    71. CCPD-OF-0059/1024/2026(CCPD-AD-0174/2026) Shri Pradipta Narayan Ganguly Vs. The Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) regarding alleged premature repatriation and harassment from the post of Registrar at AIIMS Gorakhpur 23-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 228 KB)
    72. DNO/26/CCPD/6208 Ms. Sanjana Singh Vs. Dr Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya, Madhya Pradesh alleging persistent mental harassment and administrative difficulties in pursuing her research. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 126 KB)
    73. DNO/26/CCPD/6241 Shri Munna Thakur Vs. The Chief General Manager, Axis Bank, Sunderpur, Varanasi submitted that despite possessing valid identity documents and maintaining bank accounts with other banking institutions, he has been unable to open a savings bank account with the Respondent due to inaccessible banking procedures and digital platforms. 21-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 126 KB)