Menu Toggle
More
    Close

    September 2026 Orders in Admission Matters

    S. No. Case No. Case Topic Order Date Coram Attachment File
    1. CCPD-AD-0051/2026 Mr. Shaik Zaheer Vs. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO), National Trust, New Delhi alleging that the renewal of his daughter’s Niramaya Health Insurance Card remained pending despite payment of the requisite renewal fee. 01-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 293 KB)
    2. CCPD/16264/1012/2025(DNO/25/CCPD/4757) Shri Pushkarraj Bahety Vs. The Executive Officer, Reserve Bank of India stating that the online application form for the RBI Grade B Officer Examination 2025 does not provide an option for candidates with low vision to avail compensatory (extra) time. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    3. DNO/25/CCPD/5251 Shri Rohit Kumar Mishra Vs. The Principal Chief Material Manager, West Central Railway AND The Senior Material Manager, Katni Loco Shed, West Central Railway alleged that, despite being eligible for promotion to the post of Junior Clerk, his representation dated 14.10.2024 was rejected vide letter dated 06.10.2025, citing Railway Board’s letter dated 31.12.2024, which he contends is inconsistent with the spirit and intent of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgment and DoPT instructions. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    4. DNO/26/CCPD/6062 Akhilraj Raj Thakur Vs. CBA Services Private Limited, Karnataka stated that despite suffering from severe depression, subsequently supported by medical evidence indicating a high severity score, his employment was terminated in December 2025 on the ground of unsatisfactory performance, without due consideration of his medical condition. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 120 KB)
    5. DNO/26/CCPD/6137 Ms. KUNALI Vs. SECRETARY, Dak Bhawan, Department of Posts AND The Assistant Director General (Admin), Department of Posts, stated that her candidature was rejected on account of an inadvertent clerical error in the online application, wherein she mentioned “CBSE” instead of the Haryana Board of School Education. She submitted that the error was unintentional and that all her supporting documents reflected the correct educational qualification and details. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 123 KB)
    6. DNO/26/CCPD/6142 Shubham Rajvanshi Vs. The Chief General Manager, Central Bank of India stated that his father-in-law is with benchmark visual impairment and his mother-in-law has benchmark locomotor disability, and that their disability details have been duly updated in his HRMS records. He further submitted that his father is suffering from kidney failure and is undergoing regular dialysis. In view of these circumstances, he has been seeking transfer to Udaipur or Jaipur on compassionate grounds since December 2024 through multiple HRMS applications and representations. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    7. DNO/26/CCPD/6209 Shri Mayank Arora Vs. The Chairman and Managing Director, Bharat Electronics Ltd. submitted that the Respondent, Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), has repeatedly failed to comply with the statutory reservation policy for persons with benchmark disabilities in its recruitment processes. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 133 KB)
    8. DNO/26/CCPD/6211 Smt. Kanchan Sadabhai Parmar Vs. The Director General, Postal Services AND The Chief Post Master General (Gujarat Circle) AND The Department of Personnel and Training, submitted that the Respondent, Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), has repeatedly failed to comply with the statutory reservation policy for persons with benchmark disabilities in its recruitment processes. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 155 KB)
    9. DNO/26/CCPD/6216 Shri Aditya Prakash Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, EPFO AND The Chairman, Bihar Gramin Bank alleging wrongful denial of family pension following the demise of their father, who was an EPS-1995 pensioner and an employee of Bihar Gramin Bank. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 127 KB)
    10. DNO/26/CCPD/6228 Shri Kartikey Singh Vs. The Director, AIIMS, New Delhi contesting that he had qualified the AIIMS Common Recruitment Examination (CRE) under Group Code 02, securing All India Rank 165 and OBC-PwBD Category Rank 2. It was
    submitted that despite his merit, his candidature had been cancelled, and he had been denied participation in the choice filling process for seat allocation.    		 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    11. DNO/26/CCPD/6253 Mr. Sitender Vs. The Director General, Employees State Insurance Corporation submitted that he was transferred from the ESIC Branch Office, Rohtak to the Regional Office, Faridabad. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 122 KB)
    12. DNO/26/CCPD/6254 Shri Vivek Yadav Vs. The Chairman, National Highways Authority of India stating that he purchased an adapted car for his personal use, bearing registration number UP 72 CF 9025, and applied several months ago for a FASTag with toll tax exemption available to persons with disabilities. However, the FASTag has not been issued till date. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 120 KB)
    13. DNO/26/CCPD/6255 Mr. Said Ahmad Vs. The Joint Secretary & Chief Administrative Officer, Ministry of Defense stating that he was selected for the post of Assistant Registrar in the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on deputation basis. However, despite his selection and willingness to join, his parent department did not relieve him, stating that the Cadre Controlling Authority had not granted approval. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 128 KB)
    14. DNO/26/CCPD/6260 Shri Aashish Kumar Jha Vs. The Director General, Postal Services AND The Chief Postmaster General (Bihar Circle) AND The Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training alleged that appointment-related memoranda had been issued by the postal authorities and that he was repeatedly assured that his services would be regularized. However, despite rendering service for nearly ten years, his services were never regularized and, upon raising the issue, he was allegedly terminated from service. Aggrieved by the alleged illegal termination and non-regularization, the Complainant approached this Court seeking appropriate relief. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 128 KB)
    15. DNO/26/CCPD/6283 Shri Banti Kumar Vs. The Director, IIT Roorkee alleged that IIT Roorkee is stating that it cannot modify the data received from NTA, which has prevented him from availing compensatory time and uploading Form-I before the registration deadline. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    16. DNO/26/CCPD/6349 Shri Bavyesh Badhwar (represented by his mother Ms. Vinkle Badhwar) Vs. The Chairman, CBSE AND The Principal, Seth Hukam Chand SD Public School, Kapurthala AND The Chairman, ICSE (impleaded) despite accepting the admission fee for Class I for the academic session 2026–27, the school allegedly refused to permit the child to continue from the second day of the academic session. 02-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 130 KB)
    17. DNO/26/CCPD/6059 HARISH CHANDRA Vs. The Chairman, State Bank of India alleged that the delay in joining was attributable to the medical condition detected during the Bank’s own medical examination and that, despite belonging to the PwD category, his request was not reconsidered. He also submitted that he did not receive any formal physical communication regarding withdrawal of his candidature and became aware of the same through email communication. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    18. DNO/26/CCPD/6090 SYED SHAKEEB AHMAD Vs. The Chairman, State Bank of Inida submitted that on 12.03.2026, he visited the Specialized NRI Branch of State Bank of India, Varanasi, for updating the address in his passbook and for photo attestation required in connection with his Aadhaar address update. He alleged that, during the process, he was issued a passbook containing pages carrying sensitive financial particulars of another customer, which had allegedly been manually removed and his own account particulars were thereafter printed on the remaining pages. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 131 KB)
    19. DNO/26/CCPD/6385 Shri Manoj Kumar Tyagi Vs. The Vice Chairman, Delhi Development Authority stating that he was allotted an LIG flat under the DDA Housing Scheme 2017 in the Persons with Disabilities (PwD) category. He stated that he has paid the entire demanded amount and completed all the required formalities and documentation. However, despite fulfilling all the requirements, the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has not issued the possession letter. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 123 KB)
    20. DNO/26/CCPD/6555 Shri Nitesh Kumar Vs. The Director, NIEPVD/NIVH, Dehradun submitted a grievance dated 24.07.2026 contesting that eligible students of the 2023–2025 batch have not been provided laptops under the scheme of the National Institute for the Empowerment of Persons with Visual Disabilities (NIEPVD/NIVH), despite being entitled to receive them. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    21. DNO/26/CCPD/6036 Shri Himanshu Kabra Vs. The Chairman, Coal India Limited (CIL) regarding non-compliance with statutory PwD reservation during the departmental promotion/recruitment exercise from non-executive to executive category (HR discipline) under Notification No. 02/2025 issued by Coal India Limited (CIL). 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 129 KB)
    22. DNO/26/CCPD/6086 Dilip Pashi Vs. General Manager, South Eastern Railway AND Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway Workshop, Kharagpur submitted that he is a person with benchmark locomotor disability and the son of Late Shri Ram Piare Pashi, a former Railway employee, and Smt. Lakshmi Pashi, the present family pensioner. He stated that his disability status had been verified in the Railway records. He submitted that he had sought endorsement of his name as a disabled dependent in his mother’s PPO. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 121 KB)
    23. DNO/26/CCPD/6070 Shri Nilendra Moni Dutta Vs. The Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur alleging procedural irregularities and discrimination during the recruitment process for the post of Deputy Registrar (Advt. No. 1/2023) at Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 128 KB)
    24. DNO/26/CCPD/6363 Shri Swaviman Sahoo Vs. The Registrar, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela stated that while he was near the Jagda Gate of the National Institute of Technology (NIT), Rourkela, he was allegedly abused and physically assaulted by one of the two security guards posted at the gate. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 128 KB)
    25. DNO/26/CCPD/6398 Ms. Jancy D. (represented by Shri D. Sam Thomas) Vs. The Director General, Employees State Insurance Corporation stating that he is working as a Nursing Officer at ESIC Hospital, Tirunelveli, and is the only son and primary caregiver of his mother, who is a person with benchmark permanent locomotor disability and holds a valid UDID certificate. He stated that he was initially appointed at ESIC Hospital, Delhi in 2009 but was transferred to Tamil Nadu in 2013 on compassionate grounds to take care of his disabled mother, after giving up his seniority and promotional opportunities. 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    26. DNO/26/CCPD/6358 Shri Jhatothu Rahul Vs. The General Manager, South Western Railway stating that on 29.04.2026 at around 7:30 PM, the Reservation Clerk refused to issue a railway ticket under the concessional reservation facility for persons with
    Thalassemia, stating that his railway concession form was not valid.    		 03-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    27. DNO/26/CCPD/6141 Ujala Safreen Vs. Director, National Insitute of Technology, Srinagar alleged discrimination, harassment and denial of academic rights on account of her disability and medical condition. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    28. DNO/26/CCPD/6143 KARAN PRATAP SINGH Vs. Chairman, State Bank of India alleged that, despite submitting the requisite documents, including the death certificate and nominee details, the SBI Branch at Nawabganj, Bareilly, did not permit him to access the locker, process its closure or settle the claim amount. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    29. DNO/26/CCPD/6152 HARISH CHANDRA Vs. Central Provident Fund Commissioner, (CPFC), EPFO alleging non-updation of his disability status in his Universal Account Number (UAN) profile maintained by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO). 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 125 KB)
    30. DNO/26/CCPD/6499 Shri Rakesh Kumar Vs. The CEO and Managing Director, Canara Bank stating that he had requested a transfer from Ranchi to his hometown, Gaya, during the Annual General Transfer 2025 in accordance with the Bank’s transfer guidelines for persons with disabilities. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 124 KB)
    31. DNO/26/CCPD/6361 Shri Rahul Kumar Singh Vs. The Secretary, Department of Posts AND The Senior Manager, Indian Post Payments Bank (Deoghar) alleged that despite repeated requests for more than one year, the IPPB Deoghar Branch Manager has failed to issue the required indemnity letter, has not responded properly to his requests, and has delayed the matter unnecessarily. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 122 KB)
    32. DNO/26/CCPD/6372 Shri Prahalad Gurjar Vs. The Chairman, Staff Selection Commission AND The Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension his candidature was rejected on the ground that his scribe possessed a higher educational qualification. The complainant alleged that there is no rule prohibiting a scribe from having a higher qualification and that the rejection is contrary to the DoPT Office Memorandum dated 29.08.2018, the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Vikash Kumar v. UPSC (2021). 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 146 KB)
    33. DNO/26/CCPD/6210 Ms. Kumari Rituvarna Banerjee (Represented by Shri Saikat Banerjee) Vs. The Deputy Director General, UIDAI Regional Office, Mumbai submitted that the Respondent authorities failed to facilitate the mandatory biometric update of the child’s Aadhaar despite repeated attempts. It was submitted that during visits to the Aadhaar Seva Kendra, the officials insisted upon capturing fingerprints despite the child’s disability, instead of invoking the Biometric Exception mechanism available under the UIDAI framework, resulting in repeated failure of enrolment and considerable hardship. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 134 KB)
    34. DNO/26/CCPD/6373 Shri Vishal Choudhary Vs. The Courter, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan Submitted a grievance dated 13.07.2026 and stated that he was working as a TGT (Sanskrit) at PM Shri Kendriya Vidyalaya, Mathana, Kurukshetra. He alleged that after being selected for another government post through the Haryana Staff Selection Court (HSSC), he submitted a technical resignation, but the school authorities wrongly treated it as a simple resignation, resulting in the loss of his past service benefits, including earned leave, pay protection, and gratuity. 06-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 131 KB)
    35. CCPD-AD-0165/2026 Dr. A. Chidambaram Vs. The Director, National Institute of Speech and Hearing (NISH)Thiruvananthapuram AND The Member Secretary, Rehabilitation Council of India Submitted despite securing 6th rank, his daughter has not received an admission call letter. On enquiry, they came to know that non-Keralite candidates under the Management Quota are not being considered for admission this year, although this restriction was not mentioned in the prospectus. 08-09-2026 Commissioner View Details (PDF 241 KB)